PETA Against Fur

'Fur?'
'I'd rather go naked'
Eva Mendes
Eva Mendes for PETA

'I Always Fake It'
'I'd NEVER wear real FUR'

Holly Madison
Holly Madison
Holly Madison - for PETA
'I'd rather go naked than wear fur'
Joanna Krupa
Joanna Krupa
Joanna Krupa
Joanna Krupa - for PETA
'We'd rather go naked than wear fur'
Kori and Jason
Kori and Jason of Mates of State - for PETA
'Be comfortable with your own skin and let animals keep theirs.'
Steve-O
Steve-O
Steve-O - for PETA

 
  • Do not try this at home Agency: Ogilvy, Frankfurt, Germany / Creative Director: Stephan Junghanns / Art Director ...
  • Humans are animals and All animals have the same skin Advertising Agency: JWT Kuwait Executive Creative Director ...
  • "The Naked Truth" and "Lost my sheep" are trying to convince us to stop eating meat (sheep). Personally I don't ...
  • It makes me puke when I see Levi's Copper Jeans ads. "Levi's Copper Jeans Denim, Metal & Passion" Advertisin ...
  • Maggie Q stars in a new ad for PETA Asia-Pacific wearing a bikini made completely of deliberately placed lettuce ...
  • In countries where snow is synonymous with holidays, guerrilla marketing is a very good idea. Venture Communicat ...
  • Every girl will take any of these gorgeous Louis Vuitton handgags! “I thought the idea of hot chicks and cars ...
  • Head Up His Butt KFC allows its suppliers to cut the beaks off baby birds without any painkillers, breed and dru ...
  • 'Lorgan's The Retro Store. Everything from the 60s. Well, almost.' Advertising Agency: Ogilvy & Mather, Sing ...
  • 'Wake up with a premium roast coffee.' Beautiful realization of a simple idea. I hate it! I hate McDonald's!
adsneeze's picture
Anonymous's picture
1. Great Collection

Great Collection

Quit Smoking Tips's picture
2. Awesome collection ...

Awesome collection mate. I will also go naked in the protest, rather than wearing fur.

Singobarong's picture
3. If using animal ...

If using animal skin/leather can endangered animals, please tell me where i can get synthetic tiger skin/leather and peacocks fur. Because barongan and dadak merak, as crucial elements of Reog Ponorogo, using those materials as the component.

Skoda105GL's picture
4. Holly Madison this is ...

Holly Madison this is good !ye!!

Anonymous's picture
5. i guess pornography ...

i guess pornography and explotation of the female body is way better than wearing fur???? hmmmmmmmmmm............
I am an animal lover but against this kind of attention to save animals. Save animals exploit women campaign

Anonymous's picture
6. I quite agree .... ...

I quite agree ....
ugly way to save animals & exploit women

Gulliver's picture
7. We all exploit and are ...

We all exploit and are exploited, as for the "exploit women campaigne", this women chose to exploit using her sexuality and nudity to get what she wanted, weather it be fame, money, excitement etc. This add is an artistic image, a vehicle to portray a message.
This message is for the awareness of people to "consider" that there is nothing sexy about wearing something that is tied to senseless pain and killing.

PORNOGRAPHY - (from Greek πόρνη (porni) "prostitute" and γραφή (grafi) "writing"), more informally referred to as porn or porno, is the representation of the human body or sexual activity with the goal of sexual arousal. It is similar to, but distinct from erotica, though the two terms are often used interchangeably.
In general, "erotica" refers to portrayals of sexually arousing material that hold or aspire to artistic or historical merit, whereas "pornography" often connotes the prurient depiction of sexual acts, with little or no artistic value. The line between "erotica" and the term "pornography" (which is frequently considered a pejorative) is often highly subjective. In practice, pornography can be defined merely as erotica that is perceived as "obscene". The definition of what one considers obscene can differ among persons, cultures and eras. This leaves legal actions by those who oppose pornography open to wide interpretation.

EXPLOIT -
noun; A heroic or extraordinary deed.

verb; Benefit unfairly from the work of (someone), typically by overworking or underpaying them.
Use a situation or a person in an unfair or selfish way.

transitive verb; To use for one's own advantage.

Anonymous's picture
8. You are an idiot.

You are an idiot.

Meat-eater's picture
9. I like eating meat and ...

I like eating meat and wearing animal fur.

h477's picture
10. Psh, if you kill it, ...

Psh, if you kill it, you use it. Native Pride.

Anonymous's picture
11. That is different.

That is different.

Jack's picture
12. These naked women ...

These naked women should say,
"I would rather get raped than wear fur....!"
here, something is at stake, at least.

Anonymous's picture
13. question: is creating ...

question: is creating plastic goods to take the place of animal products (ex. pleather for clothing & shoes, plastic fur) better for the environment than using actual animals? as in.. will these plastic products that are more disposable (they are cheaper, therefore people are less likely to hold on to them for long periods of time because they have no financial investment in them) harm the environment (where animals live) moreso than using actual animals?

Anonymous's picture
14. I've never heard this ...

I've never heard this argument before and it makes so much sense!

Anonymous's picture
15. right campaign. wrong ad.

right campaign. wrong ad.

nandkishore's picture
16. to use the skin of ...

to use the skin of animal and killing of them for religious event full filling they should think to keep to place it to them self. It should stop to killing the animals immediatly and introduce ourself a realy humanbeing. it shows we are still living in the middle age

Jhuni's picture
17. This women don't have ...

This women don't have to be there. They could leave if they want to.

Animals, including humans, don't want to be skinned alived, eaten, mutilated, or beaten and they will frequently resist with all their might. If I try to beat you or any other animal, you will most certainly resist, where as these women only have to say "stop" so their is a fundamental difference.

Besides that what is so sacred about the human body? For millions of years humans basically didn't wear clothes at all, its only something recently developed and it something which is placed value by individual cultures. There is no good reason why our natural bodies should be source of embarrassment or suffering.

On the other hand, skinning someone alive is certainly a source of monumental suffering, as is taking a Seal or another animal, killing it and skinning it alive in front of its mother, or having a rabbit see other rabbits get their heads sliced straight off. I am sick of people using the excuse that PETA abuses women, there is no comparison at all to the suffering and brutality caused in animals.

Anonymous's picture
18. 1) NO ANIMAL IN THE ...

1) NO ANIMAL IN THE FUR INDUSTRY IS SKINNED ALIVE, TRY DOING SO AND SEE IF YOU CAN! THOSE ARE PETA SNUFF VIDEOS www.furcommission.com/news/newsF08q.htm

2) WWW.PETAKILLSANIMALS.COM ...AND USES BILLIONS OF DOLLARS FOR INMORAL AD CAMPAIGNS, HAVING NOT EVEN 1 ANIMAL SHELTER!!!

3) PETA WOULD RATHER HAVE YOU DIE OF CANCER, AIDS, DIABETES, ETC THAN DO LAB EXPERIMENTS TO FIND A CURE...THEY HATE HUMAN BEINGS.

4) PETA IS NOT ECOLOGICAL: PLEATHER (PLASTIC LEATHER) IS HIGHLY HARMFUL FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: MORE PLASTIC IS THE WORST WE COULD HAVE: MORE POLLUTION, MORE FISH DEATHS FOR PLASTIC INTOXICATION, MORE WATER CONTAMINATION...FASHION CAN DO WITH FUR, LEATHER, AND SHOULD DO WITHOUT PLASTIC!!

5) BE ECOLOGICAL: STOP PLASTIC, STOP PLASTIC VEGANS THAT WANT YOU TO HATE BIODEGRADABLE MATERIALS, WHEN THESE ARE THE TRUE ECOLOGICAL ONES. STOP THESE CAMPAIGNS THAT EMPTY YOUNG BRAINS AND FILL THEM WITH SUBJECTS THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH ECOLOGY.

ID RATHER USE MINK THAN POLLUTE THE WORLD WITH PETROCHEMICALS!!!!!!! ID RATHER EAT FARMED MEAT THAN PLASTIC RAPPED FOOD (HIGHLY CARCINOGENIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) ID RATHER LOOK AT WHAT OUR GRANPARENTS DID (THEY WERE TRULLY ECO-FRIENDLY) AND BUY LONG LASTING HIGH QUALITY PRODUCTS, THAN DISPOSSABLE AND HIGHLY POLLUTIONG SHORT LIFE PLASTIC CRAP.

GET SERIOUS. STOP PETA. GET SERIOUS. BE ECOLOGICAL. STOP PLASTIC LOBBYISTS.

Dumitru Mihaela's picture
19. Eu sunt o mare fana a ...

Eu sunt o mare fana a lui Holly si Kendra...Va salut din Romania. Eu va admir foarte mult, aa si am uitat sa ma prezint.Ma numesc Bianca si locuiest in Europa...mai precis in Romania.Sincer ..singura poza care imi place este cea cu Holly..restul sunt niste ratati...Te admir foarte mult Holly..salutari din Romania...Pa pa :-h

NJ Web Design Company's picture
20. Its really great and ...

Its really great and useful for animal coz animal are valuable part of our nature and earth so why we kill them for our use . PETA is good organization and i salute all PETA member

Anonymous's picture
21. There is absolutely ...

There is absolutely nothing wrong with encouraging the ethical treatment of all animals. Whether or not you agree with PETA's methods or not we should all agree that raising awareness to animal cruelty is a good thing. Wearing fur is so excessive and usually just an attempt of displaying wealth. Maybe those shallow people should buy a benz instead...at least that wouldn't involve murdering innocent animals

Anonymous's picture
22. It's the human body.. ...

It's the human body.. Get over it!

Anonymous's picture
23. id rather wear fur ...

id rather wear fur than go naked. :P
showing hot bodies doesnt make ppl like me, who are uncomfortable with their bodies, want to go naked. Petas ads dont make sense to me.

debs's picture
24. i disagree with your ...

i disagree with your comments..... they are not exploiting women as they are taking their own clothes off and not showing any bits, get over it... its art to save animals..... and also men do it for peta too... so got over it in my opinion!!! if you really love animals you would feel the same way

Anonymous's picture
25. Defend animals - ok, ...

Defend animals - ok, kill 90% of them saved - not so ok... So, PETA is not good. Simple.
PS. Krupa looks good! Wearing fur or without it:)

Lovebunney's picture
26. For people that have ...

For people that have leather seats in their car (like the benz) an animal still died for you to put your bum on it.
I am comfortable with my body, and would rather be naked than ever wear an animal. Synthetic fur doesn't smell, its cheaper, and doesn't scream.
I would much rather child molesters, rapists, sex slave trafficers be tested on than an animal that does NOT have the same chromosome structure that a human does. I personally think that its not "inhumane" to test on people like I named. They have inflicted bodily and mental harm to (mostly) women and girls. They should not be considered people or given certain privilages like having special areas in prison so that they are "safe" from other prisoners.
Try skinning your mom or best friend and telling me that you're fine with wearing their skin.

Post new comment